|
|
The Duke Regains His Chops. (1)
They need yet another new moniker, an alter ego, a stage name. What about
a name like Uncle Chop Chop for a manual of the dark arts? It could have
been all kinds of names; Pere Ubu, or Mad Jack or Rip Van Winkle but these
have all been exploited at least once. Pere Ubu had 30 seconds over Tokyo
but John at least would rather have several minutes over his childhood
estate of Thamesmead. Hes expressed a lingering fascination with
this particular estate on more than one occasion and no doubt Graham has
some baroque designs on the districts of his youth, though you would have
to ask him about that.
Conjurors and visionaries and eccentrics have come to show the other side,
the darker, sillier one. Mel Brooks took us behind the cardboard western
facades in Blazing Saddles and went from spaghetti to beans in one deft
canned food moment. We can all take a look behind the po-faced film sets
of todays big box office disasters. Behind some big moon-faced cartoon
character we could see him\her represented by a pulsating grid on a large
and expensive monitor.
The Westlers hot dog icon from the cinema foyer is not unlike the Wimpy
products that are a good feeding ground for John and Grahams fantasy
burger vision. Wimpy, the great British food outlet that still gives you
your burger on a plate, as if it really matters. Their stomping grounds,
the estates of the sixties and seventies, suddenly seem vast and hubristic
compared with the mock Tudor visions of the other Wimpy i.e. Wimpey (did
it have a ginger moggy as its logo? I cant remember). We are in
a new kind of building programme where these older skeletons have become
the property of housing associations, the remaining crumbling and neglected
personal effects of any city council. In this instance ruins are grounds
for morbid tourism. John and Graham make a plea for untidiness,
a plea for run down to look like run down and for them to exist in crumbling
privacy. The ideal village that emerges from the fevered brain of prince
Charles, where everyone knows everyone else and everything about everything,
is no grounds for an Uncle Chop Chop (though a local chutney would go
nicely on a burger). Mr Wimpy, whoever he may be, could do with some good
old-fashioned baroque sideshow terror. Instead of these fast food sound
a likes we could do with a vision of terror to startle us out of our self-indulgent
suburban reverie. I dont know if the exhibition will feature a gallows
pole as originally intended. Perhaps a house made of gallows wood would
be more appropriate. At one time this material was prized for its curative
properties, a splinter of the wood being placed in the mouth to
cure toothache. If the two Wimp(e)ys cant give it to us we
need a precedent for an architectural Chop Chop we need to start trespassing
on Charlies land. As Terry Jones said in one of the python shows,
It was a typical east end street, everybody in and out of each others
houses, with each others property.
Theres an eccentric website, amongst its arbitrary requirements
is that the historical figures it researches are camp. By virtue of this
criterion it details William Beckfords grottoes. The writer is clearly
trespassing on some ones property though as the eccentric owner is long
since dead it doesnt matter. Photos use a small boy for scale to
prove the authors theory that they were built by Williams
father for the young millionaire. Should we be worried about the author
borrowing this child for the purposes of his investigation? Hopefully
its the authors nephew. Beckford was a millionaire at the
age of nine, and at one point the richest man in Britain before he blew
it all on his extravagant tastes for servants and porcelain. Hed
made his money through exploitation, not with fast food but through the
sugar trade.
The fact that our web page author gives a very warped account of Beckford's
inventions only adds to the entertaining historical confusion. The kids
from the estate have made it onto the lords land. The geezer hasnt
got a flamethrower but the lad in the tracksuit is contributing
to something quite subversive. In Beckfords elitist fantasy vision
this would be horrifying, kids are there to be exploited. Universal education
is a bad idea as Aldus Huxley mused, as this would merely swell the ranks
of the new stupid. The writer of the websites doesnt
do himself any favours on this count. His argument about the fact that
the grottoes were built for a small boy is not even slightly convincing.
He shoots himself in the foot by commenting that apart from the small
entrances the interior spaces to these grottoes are pretty spacious, rather
like his skull.
Its hard to think that it matters as their existence is in no doubt
which is more than can be said for many other works of Beckford.
Something of his that no longer exists and barely did in its day (for
anyone not trespassing like our author of the grotto article) is Fonthill
Abbey, William Beckfords splendid country house set in a huge amount
of land. It had one extraordinary feature, its enormous tower. It was
such an improbable projection that it collapsed several times; its owners
only dismay being that he never actually saw it fall. The difference between
the tower buildings of his adulthood seems like a logical progression
from the grotto burrowings of his father. It is as if rubble from the
grottoes was reassembled like a giant worm cast. What is more puzzling
is why such a private man should pursue the building of such an architectural
beacon. Only in later life did he devise the simple motto of Secret
and Happy. He built himself in, so much so, that in desperation
he eventually sold off his estate and most of his collection.
In death and disappearance his building never gave him a lasting memorial
like an infamous contemporary Mad Jack Fuller .Mad Jack in death was entombed
in a huge and incongruous pyramid built in his local churchyard. Apparently
he was buried seated at a table with a bottle of port and a chicken in
front of him. Its this kind of good time craziness of the folly
builder that makes for good web resources. Beckford built himself the
tower but Mad Jack did the same thing, for a bet, something that any pub
goer should recognise as not without the bounds of reason after a few
stiff drinks. Mad Jack makes a lot of sense today. He has appeared on
PG Tips cards as a ruddy faced man surrounded by game pies and wine, much
as I would imagine Uncle Chop Chop to look. Mad Jack, a name to match
his dubious reputation and building exploits. Im sure he was pleased
with his name though Im not so sure if Beckfords long-suffering
child butlers appreciated theirs as much. If he was around he might have
come up with the collective moniker of Uncle Chop Chop for Beagles and
Ramsey though I hate to think of what they might be called individually.
Consider these inventions of Beckford, Pale Ambrose, Infamous Poupee,
Horrid Ghoul, Insipid Bion, Cadaverous Nicobuse, The Portentous Dwarf,
Frigid Silence, Miss Long, Miss Butterfly, Countess Pox, Mr Prudent Well-sealed-up,
The Monkey and The Turk and then feel very afraid
..
What these architect mavericks did have in common was their stubbornness
when it came to creating their own distinctly homemade visions into which
they could retreat, the paranoid foppish Beckford and the big bear-like
Mad Jack. In the Tex Avery cartoon Rock-A-Bye-Bear Spike the
dog is released form the dog pound to guard a hibernating bear, a sadistic
puppy escapes at the same time. Of course the increasingly bizarre attempts
by the puppy to wake the bear all fail. The ordinary part is that he wakes
up at the end of the cartoon, thats the contrast that makes the
cartoon theology seem all the more funny. E.L Doctorow in The Book Of
Daniel summed up cartoons of the thirties and forties like this:
"Theology: 1.people are animals. 2.the body is mortal and subject
to incredible pain. 3.;life is antagonistic to the living.4 flesh can
be sawed, crushed, frozen, stretched, burned, bombed and plucked for music.
5. the dumb are abused by the smart and the smart destroyed by their own
cunning.6. the small are tortured and the large destroyed by their own
mementum. 7. We are able to walk on air, but only as long as our illusion
supports us.
It goes back again to the idea that illusion, whether its made in
your own mind or planted there by some dubious type, this illusion can
protect against attacks on our fantasy existence. The conjuror takes no
prisoners. Now Mad Jack and William Beckford might have been sick puppies
too but they never woke up from their reverie no matter how visible their
architectural fantasies. Let us all hope to add to these ranks by making
misjudged and ill-fated attempts to create and to envisage our future
accurately. As Darryl F. Zanuck, head of 20th century Fox Studios confidently
predicted in 1946, Video wont be able to hold onto any market
after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring into
a plywood box every night. The brave new worlders have of no time
for dogma and superstition, in Huxleys last novel Island
they spend most of the time trying to be liberated from the bondage
of ego by gobbling piles of truth and reality pills.
To melancholy egomaniacs like Mad Jack, Uncle Chop Chop and Walt Disney
this sounds like a living hell. React to reality in all its dumb and inevitable
forms. As Dorothy parkers adage goes, Razors pain you, /rivers
are damp, / acids stain you, / and drugs cause cramp. / Guns arent
lawful, /nooses give, / gas smells awful, / you might as well live.
ALL HAIL THE STUPIDS!Mick Peter(1): The Duke regains His Chops, from The
Mothers of Invention album Absolutely Free, Rykodisc reissue, 1995 (orig.1967).
Aldous Huxley. Brave New World. Chatto and Windus.1932
Island. Chatto and Windus.1962. (As they appear in the Faber Book of Utopias.
Faber and Faber 1999.
E.L.Doctorow, The Book of Daniel. Pan, 1973.
He describes Disney as trying to do away with the , dark and rowdy
elements by adapting myth, literature and legend. Tex Avery on the
other hand brought out darkness and bawdiness with his own fairytale versions
like Red Hot Riding Hood. He also made Rock-A-Bye Bear.
J.Simpson & S. Roud, The Oxford Dictionary of English Folklore, Oxford
University Press 2000.
Beckford website and Beckford links: <http://www.infopt.demon.co.uk/beckfor1.htm>
|
|